A spark of hope for India’s future in Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh

In an alternative world, the BJP would have been routed in both Himachal Pradesh and Gujarat. It is the Party of the Rich, the party of corruption and deceit,  the party with fangs against minorities – particularly Muslims. Why a party with such fangs can win elections is to be seriously considered. Books – such as Manjari Katju’s new Hinduising Democracy – suggest that the rise of the BJP and its Sangh Parivar has virtually overrun not only democratic institutions but also the culture of democracy. A great many commentators wrote to say that one of the achievements of the BJP has been to silence Muslim voices during elections, to ensure that Muslims – once a key part of the Democratic coalition – have been sidelined from being able to make an electoral impact. This has been Modi’s ‘Gujarat Model’ and it became Adityanath’s ‘UP Model’ – where Muslims, a key part of the social fabric, saw their votes rendered electorally meaningless.
But it is not only the BJP’s erosion of democratic culture that is the problem. The Congress Party – which has been the main opposition to the BJP in these two states – is wracked with corruption and deceit, with being unable to appeal to the people as the party of the people. The Congress Party lost in Himachal Pradesh because its leader – Virbhadra Singh – ran a government that became known for its corruption and misrule, for its inability to stand with the people against the mafias of industry and extraction. Why would the people vote for the Congress in such a context? It has sullied its association with the freedom movement through this slide into the pockets of big business. In Gujarat, the Congress fought a tough fight, but even here the idea of the Congress is no longer that of being the party of the poor.
Jignesh Mevani
Fortunately for the Congress, it linked up with key independent voices such as Jignesh Mevani and Alpesh Thakor who provided a boost to its fortunes. Jignesh Mevani and Alpesh Thakor both won from their respective constituencies today at a time when many senior Congress leaders in Gujarat lost their seats. Jignesh won from Vadgam seat, defeating BJP’s nominee Vijay Chakravarti by 19,696 votes while Alpesh defeated BJP’s Solanki Thakor by a margin of 14857 votes in the Radhanpur constituency.
It is a symbol of the kind of alternative that is possible that in Theog (Himachal Pradesh) it was the CPI-M Rakesh Singha who won the seat.
Rakesh Singha

Singha came before the people after a decade’s long history of struggle – with the apple growers association, with the farmers of the state as the Kisan Sabha leader, as the comrade who lead the struggle against the Jaypee Company’s Wangtoo Karcham hydroelectric power project in Kinnaur (a company car ran over him, attempting – stupidly – to think that this would silence his voice), as the comrade who fought for justice for Guidya. All this and more. Comrade Singha is a standard bearer of a people’s politics. What he will do in Himachal Pradesh, Jignesh Mevani will do in Gujarat. Both will raise the voices of the people in the Assemblies, fight to build the basis for a new kind of democratic culture, build the basis for a real, powerful fightback against the corrosive politics of Money and Muscle, Hatred and Fear.

As highlighted by CPIM in its press release after the verdict, the results reflect a clear discontent among the voters against the anti-people policies of the Modi-led BJP government. But if the opposition is looking to channelize this discontent and to appeal to these voters, what it needs is a clear alternative programme against the Hindutva politics of the BJP drawing fresh battlegrounds.


4 thoughts on “A spark of hope for India’s future in Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh

  1. Dr Surendar Advani

    19th December 2017 — 6:22 pm

    Thanks you for updating on such an important political and social development.

  2. Ahmad Rashid Sherani

    20th December 2017 — 8:34 am

    Thanks a lot for showing us this “Spark of Hope”.
    It was much needed in this frightening Darkness of Despair.

  3. Purushottam kalalbandi

    22nd December 2017 — 12:05 am

    Your Analysation of alternative people’s politics is cent percent correct. Neo-liberal politics combats class struggle of working class by various methods which includes community politics also. Every community after 1990 took a different mode of organisation shedding it’s local charectors attained as state & central nature being used as material base for communal politics. Hindutwa includes reinventing it’s community politics where left should become handi- capped in it’s counter fight.
    When class includes community what is wrong in organising marginal communities under working class leadership..? Left should reinvent the community politics in consonance with class struggle. Otherwise building people’s politics would be a futile excercise.
    History of left shows some Sparks here & there but again collopsed. Why..? What about defeat of left in Bengal..? Why does left behave like handicaped when it confronts community politics..?
    Does community politics immune from dialectical nature..?

  4. Nice one. very much educative. Thanks a lot.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *